W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > April 2004

Re: another new version of QAH

From: Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 16:58:43 +0200
To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1082991523.1292.94.camel@stratustier>
Le dim 25/04/2004 ŗ 21:30, Lofton Henderson a ťcrit :
> New version at:
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2004/04/QA-handbook.html

A few comments as I read this:
- it is starting to look really good! It's so much nicer to read than
the old opsGl!
- regarding the 1st issue (stories grouped or distributed), I keep
prefering the stories in context ; I think they make more sense ther. I
guess putting them at the start of the sections is good, but I don't
have a strong opinion
- "staff" is used in 2 different contexts: staff contact and more
generally "staff resources" (or staffing) ; the former is part of the
W3C culture and should be kept, but the latter brings confusion - I read
resources from the W3C Team when I read "staff resources" ; I don't know
what's the good term to use, here, but I think we need to find one :)
- re number of participants in a WG from a given company, the max number
can be set in the charter per
http://www.w3.org/2004/02/Process-20040205/policies.html#member-rep

(more later)

Dom
-- 
Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
W3C/ERCIM
mailto:dom@w3.org


Received on Monday, 26 April 2004 10:59:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:15 GMT