W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > April 2004

Re: another new version of QAH

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 17:27:18 -0600
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20040426172414.02e6aa98@localhost>
To: Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org

At 04:58 PM 4/26/2004 +0200, Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux wrote:
>A few comments as I read this:
>- it is starting to look really good! It's so much nicer to read than
>the old opsGl!

Thanks!

>- "staff" is used in 2 different contexts: staff contact and more
>generally "staff resources" (or staffing) ; the former is part of the
>W3C culture and should be kept, but the latter brings confusion - I read
>resources from the W3C Team when I read "staff resources" ; I don't know
>what's the good term to use, here, but I think we need to find one :)

We should stack this one.  I don't have the time right now for looking and 
thinking about each occurrence.  (A contribution would be welcome.)

>- re number of participants in a WG from a given company, the max number
>can be set in the charter per
>http://www.w3.org/2004/02/Process-20040205/policies.html#member-rep

Thanks, I integrated that.

Today's editing is reflected in:

>[1] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2004/04/QA-handbook.html

Regards,
-Lofton.
Received on Monday, 26 April 2004 19:27:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:15 GMT