W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > April 2004

Re: another new version of QAH

From: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 12:07:50 -0400
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20040426120353.01e86a30@mailserver.nist.gov>
To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>, www-qa-wg@w3.org

It would be great if there was some connection between the 5 simple stories 
and the stories within the QAH.  A reason to keep them is that as use 
cases, it quickly orients the reader as to what/how the QAH is useful and 
the fact that there are templates to use.

I suggest introducing it differently - something like.
Here are 5 use cases for using QAH.  Told as stories, they illustrate when 
and how the QAH could be helpful to chairs and staff contacts.  They cover 
five different situations that chairs and staff may encounter over the life 
of the WG:
1. Think about quality early.
2. Jump-starting a testing effort
3. Test suite transfer
4. Test suite licensing
5. Test Suite processes

And then, have Story 1....Story 2.... etc.

lynne



At 10:58 AM 4/26/2004, you wrote:
>Le dim 25/04/2004 ŗ 21:30, Lofton Henderson a ťcrit :
> > New version at:
> >
> > [1] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2004/04/QA-handbook.html
>
>A few comments as I read this:
>- it is starting to look really good! It's so much nicer to read than
>the old opsGl!
>- regarding the 1st issue (stories grouped or distributed), I keep
>prefering the stories in context ; I think they make more sense ther. I
>guess putting them at the start of the sections is good, but I don't
>have a strong opinion
>- "staff" is used in 2 different contexts: staff contact and more
>generally "staff resources" (or staffing) ; the former is part of the
>W3C culture and should be kept, but the latter brings confusion - I read
>resources from the W3C Team when I read "staff resources" ; I don't know
>what's the good term to use, here, but I think we need to find one :)
>- re number of participants in a WG from a given company, the max number
>can be set in the charter per
>http://www.w3.org/2004/02/Process-20040205/policies.html#member-rep
>
>(more later)
>
>Dom
>--
>Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
>W3C/ERCIM
>mailto:dom@w3.org
>
Received on Monday, 26 April 2004 12:09:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:15 GMT