- From: Mark Skall <mark.skall@nist.gov>
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 10:17:53 -0400
- To: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>, Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>, www-qa-wg@w3.org
At 10:07 AM 4/14/2003 -0400, Lynne Rosenthal wrote: >According to your SpecGL review of SpecGL --- Guideline 4, 5, and 6 >(profiles, modules, levels) are N/A -- thus, we don't need to include a >rationale for these items . CP8.1 only requires a rationale, for when >these items are allowed. No, no, no, a thousand times no. Levels, modules, etc. are discretionary items and, we, thus, must provide a rationale for their use (by others). In our own implementation of SpecGL, we choose to not use levels, modules, profiles. Thus they are not applicable in Guidelines 4, 5 and 6. >-lynne **************************************************************** Mark Skall Chief, Software Diagnostics and Conformance Testing Division Information Technology Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8970 Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8970 Voice: 301-975-3262 Fax: 301-590-9174 Email: skall@nist.gov ****************************************************************
Received on Monday, 14 April 2003 10:17:58 UTC