W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > April 2003

Re: profiles, modules, levels [30, 41, 49, 50, 51, 97, 98]

From: Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Date: 14 Apr 2003 16:10:20 +0200
To: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
Cc: Mark Skall <mark.skall@nist.gov>, Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>, www-qa-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1050329422.944.42.camel@stratustier>
Le lun 14/04/2003 ŗ 16:07, Lynne Rosenthal a ťcrit :
> According to your SpecGL review of SpecGL --- Guideline 4, 5, and 6 
> (profiles, modules, levels) are N/A -- thus, we don't need to include a 
> rationale for these items .  CP8.1 only requires a rationale, for when 
> these items are allowed.

Except that Mark [1] sees the liberty in using such or such DoV as a
discretionary choice left to the "implementers" of specGL. As such, we
need to document the usage of these discretionary choices.

Dom

1. if I understand correctly, this is :)
-- 
Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
W3C/ERCIM
mailto:dom@w3.org

Received on Monday, 14 April 2003 10:10:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:13 GMT