- From: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 10:07:34 -0400
- To: Mark Skall <mark.skall@nist.gov>, Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>, www-qa-wg@w3.org
> >Profiles, modules and levels are separate, but related concepts. What >we're missing is a better explanation for when to use each one. In fact, >we don't conform to SpecGL (Guideline 8.1) because we don't include a >rationale for these items, especially modules. We should concentrate on >providing clear rationales, not combining them and making the water much >more murky. According to your SpecGL review of SpecGL --- Guideline 4, 5, and 6 (profiles, modules, levels) are N/A -- thus, we don't need to include a rationale for these items . CP8.1 only requires a rationale, for when these items are allowed. -lynne
Received on Monday, 14 April 2003 10:07:56 UTC