W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > April 2003

Re: profiles, modules, levels [30, 41, 49, 50, 51, 97, 98]

From: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 10:07:34 -0400
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20030414100545.01d3fe78@mailserver.nist.gov>
To: Mark Skall <mark.skall@nist.gov>, Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>, www-qa-wg@w3.org


>
>Profiles, modules and levels are separate, but related concepts.  What 
>we're missing is a better explanation for when to use each one.  In fact, 
>we don't conform to SpecGL (Guideline 8.1) because we don't include a 
>rationale for these items, especially modules.  We should concentrate on 
>providing clear rationales, not combining them and making the water much 
>more murky.

According to your SpecGL review of SpecGL --- Guideline 4, 5, and 6 
(profiles, modules, levels) are N/A -- thus, we don't need to include a 
rationale for these items .  CP8.1 only requires a rationale, for when 
these items are allowed.

-lynne
Received on Monday, 14 April 2003 10:07:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:13 GMT