- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 06:41:40 -0700
- To: danield@w3.org
- Cc: "lynne rosenthal" <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>, www-qa-wg@w3.org, ij@w3.org
At 12:30 PM 1/7/2002 +0100, Daniel Dardailler wrote: > > But what it seems to reduce to is: Should the Introduction be an > > introduction to the Framework documents alone? Or, to the QA Activity as > >My vote goes to an Intro for the Framework only, with a bit of QA >context but not the whole explanation like now. So I agree with Ian >and Lynne that most of section 2 should (and is already in fact) go on >the site. I'm not sure I understand about "already in fact". I don't find anything similar to Ch.2 on the Web site now -- a concise guide (with a little explanation) to what resources are available. Now, things are scattered about. I think such a thing is useful (on the Web site, if not in the Framework document). -Lofton.
Received on Monday, 7 January 2002 08:43:43 UTC