W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > January 2002

Re: Fwd: Re: Issue #22

From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 12:30:54 +0100
Message-Id: <200201071130.g07BUs319126@zidane.inria.fr>
To: "Lofton Henderson" <lofton@rockynet.com>
cc: "lynne rosenthal" <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>, www-qa-wg@w3.org, ij@w3.org

> But what it seems to reduce to is:  Should the Introduction be an 
> introduction to the Framework documents alone?  Or, to the QA Activity as 

My vote goes to an Intro for the Framework only, with a bit of QA
context but not the whole explanation like now. So I agree with Ian
and Lynne that most of section 2 should (and is already in fact) go on
the site.
Received on Monday, 7 January 2002 06:31:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:08 GMT