W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-p3p-policy@w3.org > October 2001

[fwd] IE 6.0 and P3P Policies Problems with Cookies

From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 05:46:49 +0200
To: www-p3p-policy@w3.org
Message-ID: <20011022054649.C2605@localhost>
----- Forwarded message from "Reddy, Ramesh" <reddyr@agedwards.com> -----

From: "Reddy, Ramesh" <reddyr@agedwards.com>
To: "'www-p3p-policy@w3.org'" <www-p3p-policy@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 17:50:10 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [Moderator Action] IE 6.0 and P3P Policies Problems with Cookies
>From rigo  Fri Oct 19 06:31:04 2001
Envelope-to: rigo@localhost
Delivery-date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 06:31:04 +0200
Old-Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 16:48:18 -0500
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)


Is it sufficient  to provide the full P3P policy file for the cookies,
without supplying the Compact Policy? I have read in the specification that
Compact Policies are optional. However, it also mentioned that the Web
Servers are supposed to scan through the full p3p policy files and generate
the Compact Policies for the cookies. If our web server not yet compatible
with P3P policies(tomcat 3.2), doesn't this mean I have no option but
provide the compact policy in the http header even though I have the full
policy in place?

Thanks in advance for any reply.


WARNING:  All e-mail sent to and from this address will be received or
otherwise recorded by the A.G. Edwards corporate e-mail system and is
subject to archival, monitoring or review by, and/or disclosure to,
someone other than the recipient.

----- End forwarded message -----
Received on Monday, 22 October 2001 05:23:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:01:07 UTC