W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-p3p-policy@w3.org > October 2001

Re: [fwd] IE 6.0 and P3P Policies Problems with Cookies

From: Lui Lui Wong <luiluiw@netscape.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 10:47:45 -0700
Message-ID: <3BD45BC1.23F3F6EF@netscape.com>
To: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
CC: www-p3p-policy@w3.org
Hi Rigo,

It is not sufficient to provide the full P3P policy for the cookies without supplying
the Compact Policy when setting cookies in IE6.0.  You need to provide a P3P
compact policy header when u r setting cookies on IE6.0 in order to make your site
P3P compliant on IE6.0.

Thanks,
Sara

Rigo Wenning wrote:

> ----- Forwarded message from "Reddy, Ramesh" <reddyr@agedwards.com> -----
>
> From: "Reddy, Ramesh" <reddyr@agedwards.com>
> To: "'www-p3p-policy@w3.org'" <www-p3p-policy@w3.org>
> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 17:50:10 -0400 (EDT)
> Subject: [Moderator Action] IE 6.0 and P3P Policies Problems with Cookies
> >From rigo  Fri Oct 19 06:31:04 2001
> Envelope-to: rigo@localhost
> Delivery-date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 06:31:04 +0200
> Old-Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 16:48:18 -0500
> X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
>
> Hi,
>
> Is it sufficient  to provide the full P3P policy file for the cookies,
> without supplying the Compact Policy? I have read in the specification that
> Compact Policies are optional. However, it also mentioned that the Web
> Servers are supposed to scan through the full p3p policy files and generate
> the Compact Policies for the cookies. If our web server not yet compatible
> with P3P policies(tomcat 3.2), doesn't this mean I have no option but
> provide the compact policy in the http header even though I have the full
> policy in place?
>
> Thanks in advance for any reply.
>
> Ramesh..
>
> ***************************************************************************************
> WARNING:  All e-mail sent to and from this address will be received or
> otherwise recorded by the A.G. Edwards corporate e-mail system and is
> subject to archival, monitoring or review by, and/or disclosure to,
> someone other than the recipient.
> ***************************************************************************************
>
> ----- End forwarded message -----

Received on Monday, 22 October 2001 13:48:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:01:07 UTC