Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP] wrote: >>Assuming DOM support, there is no real need for >><noscript> - and only modern, future browsers will >>support XHTML 2 you may assume this > > I would respectfully strongly disagree; even using the most > modern browser(s), I still operate with JavaScript disabled > by default I don't understand your argument. Why do you think XHTML 2.0 needs the <noscript> element? /JonasReceived on Thursday, 23 January 2003 10:38:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 April 2009 12:59:19 GMT