Jonas Jørgensen wrote: > > Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP] wrote: > >>Assuming DOM support, there is no real need for > >><noscript> - and only modern, future browsers will > >>support XHTML 2 you may assume this > > > > I would respectfully strongly disagree; even using the most > > modern browser(s), I still operate with JavaScript disabled > > by default > > I don't understand your argument. Why do you think XHTML 2.0 needs the > <noscript> element? Because if I operate with JavaScript disabled, and the entire contents of the page are rendered using JavaScript, then in the absence of a <noscript> tag I will see nothing, nor will I know the reason why ! ** Phil.Received on Thursday, 23 January 2003 11:44:34 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:49:30 GMT