>Some [1] would argue that there is no point in working in XHTML until it >can reliably be interpreted when delivered as text/xml. www-talk has seen >lengthy discussion on this issue. As far as I know, it's reliably interpreted by user agents' that support it. >[1] <URL: http://www.hixie.ch/advocacy/xhtml>, for example. Think I've read this before. It only talks about why one shouldn't send XHTML as text/html, right? Devon _________________________________________________________________ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmailReceived on Sunday, 5 January 2003 21:03:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:53 GMT