W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > November 2001

Re: Indicating browser support for XHTML1.0

From: <AndrewWatt2001@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 10:02:17 EST
Message-ID: <8e.1e7c7fe3.292e6d79@aol.com>
To: www-html@w3.org
In a message dated 22/11/01 12:10:47 GMT Standard Time, aclover@1value.com 
writes:


> Yes, and don't use the <tagname /> shorthand for elements 
> which are not defined as empty elements in HTML. <script /> 
> is one example likely to go disastrously wrong!

What would be the purpose of having an empty <script /> tag?

Andrew Watt
Received on Thursday, 22 November 2001 10:02:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:49 GMT