W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > November 2001

Re: [Re: Indicating browser support for XHTML1.0]

From: Brian Kavanaugh <bkavanaugh@usa.net>
Date: 22 Nov 2001 09:13:14 CST
Message-ID: <20011122151314.12219.qmail@cpdvg203.cms.usa.net>
To: www-html@w3.org
AndrewWatt2001@aol.com wrote:

> In a message dated 22/11/01 12:10:47 GMT Standard Time, aclover@1value.com 
> writes:
> 
> 
> > Yes, and don't use the <tagname /> shorthand for elements 
> > which are not defined as empty elements in HTML. <script /> 
> > is one example likely to go disastrously wrong!
> 
> What would be the purpose of having an empty <script /> tag?
> 
> Andrew Watt

<script src="/scripts/myscript.js" type="text/javascript" />

No point in having a closing tag is this example.



--
Brian Kavanaugh
Web Programmer
Clarke Lanzen Skalla Investment Firm, Inc.
14747 California St.
Omaha NE 68154
493-3313 x7155 / (800) 635-3427 x7155
briank@clsinvest.com (work)
bkavanaugh@usa.net   (home)
Received on Thursday, 22 November 2001 10:13:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:49 GMT