Re: Validation difficulties

Rob (wlkngowl@unix.asb.com)
Sun, 22 Feb 1998 14:55:00 -0500


Message-Id: <199802222006.PAA08338@unix.asb.com>
From: "Rob" <wlkngowl@unix.asb.com>
To: www-html@w3.org
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 1998 14:55:00 -0500
In-reply-to: <Pine.SOL.3.95q.980221203623.2508B-100000@wronski.math.uwaterloo.ca>
Subject: Re: Validation difficulties

Thanks for the replies. Sometimes one overlooks the obvious. Or maybe I 
missed that part of the DTD (if it isn't in the DTD it should be noted 
explicitly).

One of my CGI scripts can't use semicolons (';') however it isn't a 
problem with that one. But it gives me a minor idea for an addition to 
the HTTPD spec: when an OPTIONS method is sent, a response is returned 
with something that signifies how arguments can be formatted.

Rob


 

-----
"The word to 'kill' ain't dirty    | Robert Rothenburg wlkngowl@unix.asb.com
 I used it in the last line        | http://www.asb.com/usr/wlkngowl
 but use the short word for lovin' | http://www.wusb.org/mutant
 and Dad you wind up doin' time."  | PGP'd mail welcome (ID 0x5D3F2E99)