Re: Validation difficulties
Rob (wlkngowl@unix.asb.com)
Sun, 22 Feb 1998 14:55:00 -0500
Message-Id: <199802222006.PAA08338@unix.asb.com>
From: "Rob" <wlkngowl@unix.asb.com>
To: www-html@w3.org
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 1998 14:55:00 -0500
In-reply-to: <Pine.SOL.3.95q.980221203623.2508B-100000@wronski.math.uwaterloo.ca>
Subject: Re: Validation difficulties
Thanks for the replies. Sometimes one overlooks the obvious. Or maybe I
missed that part of the DTD (if it isn't in the DTD it should be noted
explicitly).
One of my CGI scripts can't use semicolons (';') however it isn't a
problem with that one. But it gives me a minor idea for an addition to
the HTTPD spec: when an OPTIONS method is sent, a response is returned
with something that signifies how arguments can be formatted.
Rob
-----
"The word to 'kill' ain't dirty | Robert Rothenburg wlkngowl@unix.asb.com
I used it in the last line | http://www.asb.com/usr/wlkngowl
but use the short word for lovin' | http://www.wusb.org/mutant
and Dad you wind up doin' time." | PGP'd mail welcome (ID 0x5D3F2E99)