Re: Validation difficulties

Mr A. Bagi (bagi@liverpool.ac.uk)
Tue, 24 Feb 1998 11:25:05 +0000 (GMT)


Date: Tue, 24 Feb 1998 11:25:05 +0000 (GMT)
From: "Mr A. Bagi" <bagi@liverpool.ac.uk>
To: Rob <wlkngowl@unix.asb.com>
cc: www-html@w3.org
In-Reply-To: <199802222006.PAA08338@unix.asb.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.96.980224112414.13566B-100000@yew-31.liv.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Validation difficulties

Can I have a look at your CGI, the one that doesn't accetp (;)?
Cheers.

On Sun, 22 Feb 1998, Rob wrote:

>Thanks for the replies. Sometimes one overlooks the obvious. Or maybe I 
>missed that part of the DTD (if it isn't in the DTD it should be noted 
>explicitly).
>
>One of my CGI scripts can't use semicolons (';') however it isn't a 
>problem with that one. But it gives me a minor idea for an addition to 
>the HTTPD spec: when an OPTIONS method is sent, a response is returned 
>with something that signifies how arguments can be formatted.
>
>Rob
>
>
> 
>
>-----
>"The word to 'kill' ain't dirty    | Robert Rothenburg wlkngowl@unix.asb.com
> I used it in the last line        | http://www.asb.com/usr/wlkngowl
> but use the short word for lovin' | http://www.wusb.org/mutant
> and Dad you wind up doin' time."  | PGP'd mail welcome (ID 0x5D3F2E99)
>
>