Date: Wed, 26 Nov 1997 14:01:23 +0100 (MET) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Martin_J=2E_D=FCrst?= <email@example.com> To: Clive Bruton <firstname.lastname@example.org> cc: "'email@example.com'" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, In-Reply-To: <email@example.com> Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.96.971126140048.282Tfirstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: Re: Support for Vector Images On Tue, 25 Nov 1997, Clive Bruton wrote: > Andrew n marshall wrote at 25/11/97 3:57 am > > >I would greatly appreciate the W3C to include a recommendation for > >vector-based images for HTML. Personally I would prefer this to be a > >monochromatic format that could be rendered in the foreground color (great > >opportunity for scripts!!). EPS files come to mind as a quick and easy > >solution to this problem, although I'm not an expert in the pros and cons > >of image formats. > > I think EPS is a reasonable solution, except that some will complain that > Adobe "owns" it. However if you're ok with EPS, may I suggest PDF, which > is supported in any browser that has a plug-in API. Of course there are > other formats, including Flash from Macromedia and Electrifier from > Lari/Apple. What about something like a 2D version of VRML (mostly VRML 1.0)? Regards, Martin.