Re: %flow and headers and address

Peter Flynn (
28 Sep 1996 00:42:15 +0100

Date: 28 Sep 1996 00:42:15 +0100
From: Peter Flynn <>
Subject: Re: %flow and headers and address
In-reply-to: <> (
To: (ArnoudEngelfriet)
Message-id: <>

   Sure, I would also love to see math in HTML. It's just that I wish
   people would stop seeing HTML 3.2 as the replacement for HTML 3.0.
   HTML 3.2 comes in place of HTML 2.0. 

Then it should have been labelled 2.2

Moot anyway, in view of James Clark's talk at Princeton on Thursday...