Re: %flow and headers and address

Arnoud (galactus@htmlhelp.com)
Sat, 28 Sep 1996 21:54:02 +0200


From: galactus@htmlhelp.com (Arnoud "Galactus" Engelfriet)
To: www-html@w3.org
Subject: Re: %flow and headers and address
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 1996 21:54:02 +0200
Message-ID: <aJYTy4uYOJma089yn@htmlhelp.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In article <199609272342.AAA11542@curia.ucc.ie>,
Peter Flynn <pflynn@curia.ucc.ie> wrote:
>    Sure, I would also love to see math in HTML. It's just that I wish
>    people would stop seeing HTML 3.2 as the replacement for HTML 3.0.
>    HTML 3.2 comes in place of HTML 2.0. 
> 
> Then it should have been labelled 2.2

Try explaining THAT to the clueless crowds out there who still yell
that "HTML 3.0 standard" is the latest and greatest, and who are
convinced that HTML 2.0 means no images and only <P> and <Hn>.

> Moot anyway, in view of James Clark's talk at Princeton on Thursday...

Sorry, he forgot to invite me.. :-) What was it about?

Galactus

- -- 
E-mail: galactus@htmlhelp.com .................... PGP Key: 512/63B0E665
Maintainer of WDG's HTML reference: <http://www.htmlhelp.com/reference/>


-----END PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----