- From: Micah Dubinko <MDubinko@cardiff.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 16:26:50 -0700
- To: "'www-forms-editor@w3.org'" <www-forms-editor@w3.org>
- Cc: "'Mikko Honkala (E-mail)'" <honkkis@tml.hut.fi>, "'thierry MICHEL (E-mail)'" <tmichel@w3.org>
Mikko, All your comments have been incorporated, with the following notes: * In a few places, you ask 'is this the same as the DOM event XX?' The general answer is no, since we don't require a DOM implementation to be present. We have been given clearance to create all new events. That's also why we have the xforms prefix on all the events. * Regarding events xforms-refresh, xforms-revalidate, and xforms-recalculate, you comment that your implementation always keeps the everything refreshed, revalidated, and recalculated, making these events unnecessary. These events are needed because they actually define what it means to refresh, etc. Also at one point, we intended to make it possible to limit the amount of refreshing, recalculating, etc. done on small devices by listening for these events and stopping them from reaching. (We probably need to make the XForms Actions <refresh>, etc. do their job without sending an event for this to work, however) I hope this is sufficient to resolve your Last Call request. Thanks, .micah Original Message: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms-editor/2002Feb/0004.html
Received on Thursday, 11 April 2002 19:26:56 UTC