W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms-editor@w3.org > April 2002

RE: Response to Last Call Message 18

From: Mikko Honkala <honkkis@tml.hut.fi>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 08:57:58 +0300
To: "Micah Dubinko" <MDubinko@cardiff.com>, <www-forms-editor@w3.org>
Cc: "'thierry MICHEL \(E-mail\)'" <tmichel@w3.org>
Message-ID: <MABBKMMMPFMINOJECBIOMEIPCAAA.honkkis@tml.hut.fi>
Micah,

this resolves my last call comment in message 18. 

-mikko

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-forms-editor-request@w3.org
> [mailto:www-forms-editor-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Micah Dubinko
> Sent: 12. huhtikuuta 2002 2:27
> To: 'www-forms-editor@w3.org'
> Cc: 'Mikko Honkala (E-mail)'; 'thierry MICHEL (E-mail)'
> Subject: RE: Response to Last Call Message 18
> 
> 
> Mikko,
> 
> All your comments have been incorporated, with the following notes:
> 
> * In a few places, you ask 'is this the same as the DOM event XX?'
> The general answer is no, since we don't require a DOM 
> implementation to be
> present. We have been given clearance to create all new events. 
> That's also
> why we have the xforms prefix on all the events.
> 
> * Regarding events xforms-refresh, xforms-revalidate, and
> xforms-recalculate, you comment that your implementation always keeps the
> everything refreshed, revalidated, and recalculated, making these events
> unnecessary.
> 
> These events are needed because they actually define what it means to
> refresh, etc.
> 
> Also at one point, we intended to make it possible to limit the amount of
> refreshing, recalculating, etc. done on small devices by 
> listening for these
> events and stopping them from reaching. (We probably need to make 
> the XForms
> Actions <refresh>, etc. do their job without sending an event for this to
> work, however)
> 
> 
> I hope this is sufficient to resolve your Last Call request.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> .micah
> 
> Original Message:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms-editor/2002Feb/0004.html
> 
Received on Friday, 12 April 2002 01:58:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 10 June 2009 18:12:11 GMT