W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > February 2010

Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-55 profile by amicable resolution

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:32:27 -0600
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Cc: www-archive@w3.org, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Message-ID: <1267025547.30230.135.camel@pav.lan>
I don't quite understand closing an issue with
an expectation that more work will be done on it
later.

I took a brief look at the proposal...
no change proposal for ISSUE-55, but a new plan for @profile
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Feb/0683.html

I'm not persuaded that it's not cost-effective to just
keep head/@profile in HTML 5. My position remains:

let's keep metadata profiles (head/@profile) in HTML for use in GRDDL
etc.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Jul/0571.html

I'm inclined to object to this CfC, but I'll stand by to learn
a little more about the situation first.


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 24 February 2010 15:32:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:28 GMT