W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > July 2009

Re: vCard RDF merge....

From: Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:22:42 +1000
Message-ID: <2A5B144D-60A5-4583-8658-5C4A22C9A9A4@nicta.com.au>
To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>, Brian Suda <brian.suda@gmail.com>, <www-archive@w3.org>, "Martin Hepp (UniBW)" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
Hi all......I want to complete the vCard/RDF update soon...

So the question remains....are we happy to use the rdf:value+type  
model (which is what the 2001 note uses)?

If so, does this mean that we remove the homeTel Property (etc) from  
the ontology?

Renato

On 30 Jun 2009, at 19:17, Toby Inkster wrote:

> Instead of:
>
> 	_:me a v:VCard ;
> 	     v:fn "Alice Smith" ;
> 	     v:workTel <tel:+44-7700-900123> ;
> 	     v:mobileTel <tel:+44-7700-900123> .
>
> It uses:
>
> 	_:me a v:VCard ;
> 	    v:fn "Alice Smith" ;
> 	    v:tel [
> 		    a vx:Tel ;
> 		    rdf:value <tel:+44-7700-900123> ;
> 		    vx:usage "work" , "mobile"
> 		] .
>
> My primary motivation was to be able to represent the data in the  
> hCard
> microformat in a way more closely related to the type+value  
> structure of
> hCard communications devices.
>
> It's not perfect (it breaks the "range" of the 2006 v:tel, v:email and
> v:label properties; and vx:usage should probably take a non-literal
> value) but perhaps some of the ideas there could be incorporated into
> the merged RDF vCard. In particular it should address all of the  
> points
> above.

Cheers...  Renato Iannella
NICTA
Received on Thursday, 23 July 2009 05:27:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:25 GMT