- From: Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au>
- Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:25:18 +1000
- To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- CC: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>, Brian Suda <brian.suda@gmail.com>, "www-archive@w3.org" <www-archive@w3.org>, "Martin Hepp (UniBW)" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
On 30 Jun 2009, at 19:17, Toby Inkster wrote: > One other thing it has though is a more vCard-like way of representing > telephone numbers, e-mail addresses, etc. > Instead of: > > _:me a v:VCard ; > v:fn "Alice Smith" ; > v:workTel <tel:+44-7700-900123> ; > v:mobileTel <tel:+44-7700-900123> . > > It uses: > > _:me a v:VCard ; > v:fn "Alice Smith" ; > v:tel [ > a vx:Tel ; > rdf:value <tel:+44-7700-900123> ; > vx:usage "work" , "mobile" > ] . > > My primary motivation was to be able to represent the data in the > hCard > microformat in a way more closely related to the type+value > structure of > hCard communications devices. > > It's not perfect (it breaks the "range" of the 2006 v:tel, v:email and > v:label properties; and vx:usage should probably take a non-literal > value) but perhaps some of the ideas there could be incorporated into > the merged RDF vCard. In particular it should address all of the > points > above. Yes, this the model we used for the W3C Note. See the examples in section "3.3 Properties with Attributes" in <http://www.w3.org/TR/vcard-rdf > If we stick to this, what implications are there for the vCard Ontology <http://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns> > rdf:List only becomes especially useful when you want to indicate that > the set of values for a property is a closed set. Good point. Cheers... Renato Iannella NICTA
Received on Friday, 3 July 2009 05:29:54 UTC