W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > April 2003

RE: SOAP 1.2 PR Documents

From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 23:13:18 +0200 (MEST)
To: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
cc: Noah Mendelsohn <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, "Carine Bournez (E-mail)" <carine@w3.org>, David Fallside <fallside@us.ibm.com>, Nilo Mitra <EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se>, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>, Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>, Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>, W3C Public Archive <www-archive@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.53.0304142254110.25662@tarantula.inria.fr>

On Mon, 14 Apr 2003, Martin Gudgin wrote:

> How about
>
> Mark Baker (Idokorro Mobile (PlanetFred), formerly of Sun Microsystems)
> Don Box (Microsoft Corporation, formerly of DevelopMentor)
>
> Does that style work for everyone?
+1

> This does also beg the question of what we should do with people like
> Noah and I who appear in both prevwgmb.txt and wgmb.txt
Add the "formerly" like for past members sounds a good thing.

>
> Gudge
>
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Yves Lafon [mailto:ylafon@w3.org]
> > Sent: 14 April 2003 15:26
> > To: Martin Gudgin
> > Cc: Noah Mendelsohn; Carine Bournez (E-mail); David Fallside;
> > Nilo Mitra; Henrik Frystyk Nielsen; Jean-Jacques Moreau; Marc
> > Hadley; W3C Public Archive
> >
> > On Sat, 12 Apr 2003, Martin Gudgin wrote:
> >
> > > I fixed the typo.
> >
> > Btw, I updated the participant list in the WG page (Jeff
> > Schlimmer was missing). Also, Don Box is listed as alumni for
> > DevelopMentor, should we add another entry for alumni from
> > MS? keep as-is? move to MS?
> > I see that Mark Baker is listed twice on the page and
> > remember that someone complained about that.
> >
> > >
> > > Gudge
> > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Noah Mendelsohn [mailto:noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com]
> > > > Sent: 11 April 2003 20:51
> > > > To: Martin Gudgin
> > > > Cc: Carine Bournez (E-mail); David Fallside; Nilo Mitra; Henrik
> > > > Frystyk Nielsen; Jean-Jacques Moreau; Marc Hadley; W3C Public
> > > > Archive; ylafon@w3.org
> > > >
> > > > I took a look at the comments changes.  Basically OK, but
> > there is
> > > > at least one spelling error:
> > > >
> > > > <current>
> > > > Comment information items MAY appear as children and/or
> > descendants
> > > > of the [document element] element information item but
> > not before or
> > > > after that element informaton item .
> > > > There are some restrictions in the processing model with
> > respect to
> > > > when comment information items can be added and/or removed (see
> > > > 2.7.2.1 Relayed Infoset).
> > > > </current>
> > > > <minimalChangetoFixSpelling>
> > > > Comment information items MAY appear as children and/or
> > descendants
> > > > of the [document element] element information item but
> > not before or
> > > > after that element >information< item . There are some
> > restrictions
> > > > in the processing model with respect to when comment information
> > > > items can be added and/or removed (see 2.7.2.1 Relayed Infoset).
> > > > </minimalChangetoFixSpelling>
> > > >
> > > > <possibleAdditionalChangetoMakeClearer?>
> > > > >Although not explicitly called out in the sections
> > below,< comment
> > > > information items MAY appear >in the Envelope infoset< as
> > children
> > > > and/or descendants of the [document element] element information
> > > > item, but not before or after that element
> > > > >information< item. There are some restrictions in the
> > > > processing model with respect to when comment information
> > items can
> > > > be added and/or removed (see 2.7.2.1 Relayed Infoset).
> > > > </possibleAdditionalChangetoMakeClearer?>
> > > >
> > > > Reasons for proposed additional changes:  (1) makes clear
> > that lack
> > > > of discussion below is intentional (2) make clear that we do
> > > > consider these part of the Envelope infoset and thus subject to
> > > > transmission.   I think
> > > > that's the only coherent interpretation anyway, but
> > someone might be
> > > > tempted to look at the sort of oblique introduction of
> > comments at
> > > > the top of the chapter and say:  "well, if they really mattered,
> > > > they would have been called out properly."  My proposal
> > to make it
> > > > an explicit note failed, so I'm wondering if this helps a bit.
> > > >
> > > > Honestly, I'm not pushing either of these changes hard.
> > If all we
> > > > want to do is fix the spelling, or to adopt just the first of the
> > > > additional changes, I'm fine with that.  Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > Noah Mendelsohn                              Voice: 1-617-693-4036
> > > > IBM Corporation                                Fax: 1-617-693-8676
> > > > One Rogers Street
> > > > Cambridge, MA 02142
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
> > > > 04/11/2003 09:35 AM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >         To:     "Jean-Jacques Moreau"
> > > > <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
> > > >         cc:     "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen"
> > > > <henrikn@microsoft.com>, "Marc Hadley"
> > > > <marc.hadley@sun.com>, "Nilo Mitra"
> > > > <EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se>, Noah
> > > > Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM@Lotus, "W3C Public Archive"
> > > > <www-archive@w3.org>, <ylafon@w3.org>, David Fallside/Santa
> > > > Teresa/IBM@IBMUS, "Carine Bournez \(E-mail\)" <carine@w3.org>
> > > >         Subject:        RE: SOAP 1.2 PR Documents
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yes, I added a paragraph to the start of Section 5[1] and removed
> > > > the entry from Section 1[2]
> > > >
> > > > Gudge
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > > http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/3/04/11/soap12-part1.html#soapenv
> > > > [2]
> > > > http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/3/04/11/soap12-part1.html#notation
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Jean-Jacques Moreau
> > > > > [mailto:jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr]
> > > > > Sent: 11 April 2003 14:26
> > > > > To: Martin Gudgin
> > > > > Cc: Jean-Jacques Moreau; Henrik Frystyk Nielsen; Marc
> > Hadley; Nilo
> > > > > Mitra; Noah Mendelson; W3C Public Archive; ylafon@w3.org; David
> > > > > Fallside; Carine Bournez (E-mail)
> > > > >
> > > > > The AI list also mentions issue 355:
> > > > > > 2003/04/09: Editors
> > > > > >     Incorporate 'proper' of Issue 355 (not fully implemented
> > > > > > previously)
> > > > >
> > > > > So did you do both of 421 and 422?
> > > > >
> > > > > JJ.
> > > > >
> > > > > Martin Gudgin wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I think the only issue resolutions were 421 and 422 (
> > > > > Comments and the
> > > > > > redundant namespace entry in the table in Part 1 ).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm sorting out the TOC now, Yves is on holiday
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Gudge
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >>-----Original Message-----
> > > > > >>From: Jean-Jacques Moreau
> > > > [mailto:jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr]
> > > > > >>Sent: 11 April 2003 14:22
> > > > > >>To: Martin Gudgin
> > > > > >>Cc: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen; Marc Hadley; Nilo Mitra; Noah
> > > > > Mendelson;
> > > > > >>W3C Public Archive; ylafon@w3.org; David Fallside; Carine
> > > > > >>Bournez
> > > > > >>(E-mail)
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>Ah... I was planning on spending some time this afternoon
> > > > > incoporating
> > > > > >>issue resolutions. Did you also do any of that?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>Apart from this (and cleaning up the TOC! -but Yves is good
> > > > > at doing
> > > > > >>this!-), I don't see anything else that needs doing.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>Thanks for creating the snapshots,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>JJ.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>PS. I'll on IRC shortly to speed up communication.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>Martin Gudgin wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>>As you may have seen from mail from me on the WG
> > list, the spec
> > > > > >>>documents have been updated for PR. I've made the agreed
> > > > changes,
> > > > > >>>removed diff markup and removed change logs. I've generated
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>snap shots
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>>at each stage of the process.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>I think all that needs doing now is the following:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>1.          Update namespace URIs
> > > > > >>>2.          Update status/boilerplate for PR
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>Does anyone know of anything else that needs doing?
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>I'm happy to do #1 for all three parts + schemas docs, I
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>just need to
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>>know what URIs we're going to use.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>I'm hoping Yves/Carine can do #2
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>Regards
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>Gudge
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Yves Lafon - W3C
> > "Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras."
> >
> >
>

-- 
Yves Lafon - W3C
"Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras."
Received on Monday, 14 April 2003 17:13:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:17:29 GMT