W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > April 2003

RE: SOAP 1.2 PR Documents

From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 12:25:41 -0700
Message-ID: <7C083876C492EB4BAAF6B3AE0732970E0B211A8F@red-msg-08.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Yves Lafon" <ylafon@w3.org>
Cc: "Noah Mendelsohn" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, "Carine Bournez \(E-mail\)" <carine@w3.org>, "David Fallside" <fallside@us.ibm.com>, "Nilo Mitra" <EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se>, "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>, "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>, "Marc Hadley" <marc.hadley@sun.com>, "W3C Public Archive" <www-archive@w3.org>

How about 

Mark Baker (Idokorro Mobile (PlanetFred), formerly of Sun Microsystems)
Don Box (Microsoft Corporation, formerly of DevelopMentor) 

Does that style work for everyone?

This does also beg the question of what we should do with people like Noah and I who appear in both prevwgmb.txt and wgmb.txt

Gudge

> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yves Lafon [mailto:ylafon@w3.org] 
> Sent: 14 April 2003 15:26
> To: Martin Gudgin
> Cc: Noah Mendelsohn; Carine Bournez (E-mail); David Fallside; 
> Nilo Mitra; Henrik Frystyk Nielsen; Jean-Jacques Moreau; Marc 
> Hadley; W3C Public Archive
> 
> On Sat, 12 Apr 2003, Martin Gudgin wrote:
> 
> > I fixed the typo.
> 
> Btw, I updated the participant list in the WG page (Jeff 
> Schlimmer was missing). Also, Don Box is listed as alumni for 
> DevelopMentor, should we add another entry for alumni from 
> MS? keep as-is? move to MS?
> I see that Mark Baker is listed twice on the page and 
> remember that someone complained about that.
> 
> >
> > Gudge
> >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Noah Mendelsohn [mailto:noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com]
> > > Sent: 11 April 2003 20:51
> > > To: Martin Gudgin
> > > Cc: Carine Bournez (E-mail); David Fallside; Nilo Mitra; Henrik 
> > > Frystyk Nielsen; Jean-Jacques Moreau; Marc Hadley; W3C Public 
> > > Archive; ylafon@w3.org
> > >
> > > I took a look at the comments changes.  Basically OK, but 
> there is 
> > > at least one spelling error:
> > >
> > > <current>
> > > Comment information items MAY appear as children and/or 
> descendants 
> > > of the [document element] element information item but 
> not before or 
> > > after that element informaton item .
> > > There are some restrictions in the processing model with 
> respect to 
> > > when comment information items can be added and/or removed (see 
> > > 2.7.2.1 Relayed Infoset).
> > > </current>
> > > <minimalChangetoFixSpelling>
> > > Comment information items MAY appear as children and/or 
> descendants 
> > > of the [document element] element information item but 
> not before or 
> > > after that element >information< item . There are some 
> restrictions 
> > > in the processing model with respect to when comment information 
> > > items can be added and/or removed (see 2.7.2.1 Relayed Infoset).
> > > </minimalChangetoFixSpelling>
> > >
> > > <possibleAdditionalChangetoMakeClearer?>
> > > >Although not explicitly called out in the sections 
> below,< comment
> > > information items MAY appear >in the Envelope infoset< as 
> children 
> > > and/or descendants of the [document element] element information 
> > > item, but not before or after that element
> > > >information< item. There are some restrictions in the
> > > processing model with respect to when comment information 
> items can 
> > > be added and/or removed (see 2.7.2.1 Relayed Infoset).
> > > </possibleAdditionalChangetoMakeClearer?>
> > >
> > > Reasons for proposed additional changes:  (1) makes clear 
> that lack 
> > > of discussion below is intentional (2) make clear that we do 
> > > consider these part of the Envelope infoset and thus subject to
> > > transmission.   I think
> > > that's the only coherent interpretation anyway, but 
> someone might be 
> > > tempted to look at the sort of oblique introduction of 
> comments at 
> > > the top of the chapter and say:  "well, if they really mattered, 
> > > they would have been called out properly."  My proposal 
> to make it 
> > > an explicit note failed, so I'm wondering if this helps a bit.
> > >
> > > Honestly, I'm not pushing either of these changes hard.  
> If all we 
> > > want to do is fix the spelling, or to adopt just the first of the 
> > > additional changes, I'm fine with that.  Thanks.
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Noah Mendelsohn                              Voice: 1-617-693-4036
> > > IBM Corporation                                Fax: 1-617-693-8676
> > > One Rogers Street
> > > Cambridge, MA 02142
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
> > > 04/11/2003 09:35 AM
> > >
> > >
> > >         To:     "Jean-Jacques Moreau"
> > > <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
> > >         cc:     "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen"
> > > <henrikn@microsoft.com>, "Marc Hadley"
> > > <marc.hadley@sun.com>, "Nilo Mitra"
> > > <EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se>, Noah
> > > Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM@Lotus, "W3C Public Archive"
> > > <www-archive@w3.org>, <ylafon@w3.org>, David Fallside/Santa 
> > > Teresa/IBM@IBMUS, "Carine Bournez \(E-mail\)" <carine@w3.org>
> > >         Subject:        RE: SOAP 1.2 PR Documents
> > >
> > >
> > > Yes, I added a paragraph to the start of Section 5[1] and removed 
> > > the entry from Section 1[2]
> > >
> > > Gudge
> > >
> > > [1] 
> > > http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/3/04/11/soap12-part1.html#soapenv
> > > [2] 
> > > http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/3/04/11/soap12-part1.html#notation
> > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Jean-Jacques Moreau 
> > > > [mailto:jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr]
> > > > Sent: 11 April 2003 14:26
> > > > To: Martin Gudgin
> > > > Cc: Jean-Jacques Moreau; Henrik Frystyk Nielsen; Marc 
> Hadley; Nilo 
> > > > Mitra; Noah Mendelson; W3C Public Archive; ylafon@w3.org; David 
> > > > Fallside; Carine Bournez (E-mail)
> > > >
> > > > The AI list also mentions issue 355:
> > > > > 2003/04/09: Editors
> > > > >     Incorporate 'proper' of Issue 355 (not fully implemented
> > > > > previously)
> > > >
> > > > So did you do both of 421 and 422?
> > > >
> > > > JJ.
> > > >
> > > > Martin Gudgin wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I think the only issue resolutions were 421 and 422 (
> > > > Comments and the
> > > > > redundant namespace entry in the table in Part 1 ).
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm sorting out the TOC now, Yves is on holiday
> > > > >
> > > > > Gudge
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >>-----Original Message-----
> > > > >>From: Jean-Jacques Moreau
> > > [mailto:jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr]
> > > > >>Sent: 11 April 2003 14:22
> > > > >>To: Martin Gudgin
> > > > >>Cc: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen; Marc Hadley; Nilo Mitra; Noah
> > > > Mendelson;
> > > > >>W3C Public Archive; ylafon@w3.org; David Fallside; Carine 
> > > > >>Bournez
> > > > >>(E-mail)
> > > > >>
> > > > >>Ah... I was planning on spending some time this afternoon
> > > > incoporating
> > > > >>issue resolutions. Did you also do any of that?
> > > > >>
> > > > >>Apart from this (and cleaning up the TOC! -but Yves is good
> > > > at doing
> > > > >>this!-), I don't see anything else that needs doing.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>Thanks for creating the snapshots,
> > > > >>
> > > > >>JJ.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>PS. I'll on IRC shortly to speed up communication.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>Martin Gudgin wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>As you may have seen from mail from me on the WG 
> list, the spec 
> > > > >>>documents have been updated for PR. I've made the agreed
> > > changes,
> > > > >>>removed diff markup and removed change logs. I've generated
> > > > >>
> > > > >>snap shots
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>at each stage of the process.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>I think all that needs doing now is the following:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>1.          Update namespace URIs
> > > > >>>2.          Update status/boilerplate for PR
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>Does anyone know of anything else that needs doing?
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>I'm happy to do #1 for all three parts + schemas docs, I
> > > > >>
> > > > >>just need to
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>know what URIs we're going to use.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>I'm hoping Yves/Carine can do #2
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>Regards
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>Gudge
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> 
> --
> Yves Lafon - W3C
> "Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras."
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 14 April 2003 15:26:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:17:29 GMT