W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: CONSISTIENT ID, MULTIPLE WAYS, & LINK PURPOSE (2.4.4), ON FOCUS, AND ONINPUT

From: Tim <dogstar27@optushome.com.au>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 17:32:08 +1000
Message-Id: <04a5224e244662b45198cc44a71c3bec@optushome.com.au>
Cc: Richard_Userite <richard@userite.com>
To: "'WAI Interest Group list'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Let us thank those who help us on this group and to keep our demands of 
them to the minimum and keep it simple.
There are many good books and online resources as well as this group. 
the web Standards Group might also have many good ideas on coding.

Thanks David and Richard for all your time and expertise.

Tim

On 06/08/2009, at 11:20 AM, Richard_Userite wrote:

> Chris,
>  
> I am sorry but we are going round in circles here and are likely to 
> disappear up somehwere unpleasant. Please provide an actual example of 
> what you are doing, including the HTML code and a description of the 
> target.
>  
> Richard
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Chris Reeve
>> To: forums@david-woolley.me.uk
>> Cc: Richard_Userite ; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
>> Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 1:40 AM
>> Subject: Re: Fw: Re: CONSISTIENT ID, MULTIPLE WAYS, & LINK PURPOSE 
>> (2.4.4), ON FOCUS, AND ONINPUT
>>
>> David and Richard, are you forgetting that the target link already 
>> has the information in place. Since the target link already has this 
>> in place, why should I be held responsible to revise my text link 
>> since there are no downloable documents on my own site.?
>>
>> --- On Wed, 8/5/09, David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>> From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
>>> Subject: Re: Fw: Re: CONSISTIENT ID, MULTIPLE WAYS, & LINK PURPOSE 
>>> (2.4.4), ON FOCUS, AND ONINPUT
>>> To: "Chris Reeve" <chrisreeve15@yahoo.com>
>>> Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
>>> Date: Wednesday, August 5, 2009, 9:32 PM
>>>
>>> Chris Reeve wrote:
>>> >
>>>
>>> >     Why do I need to post the full link with the type of file 
>>> since it
>>> >     is not my document and not on my server?
>>>
>>> Which server it is on is a technical detail of the addressing 
>>> structure and not really relevant to the concepts behind the web.  
>>> In fact, the key thing that makes the web different from earlier 
>>> hypertext is that cross-server links are treated the same as within 
>>> document links (apart from some short hand - relative URLs - in the 
>>> addressing).
>>>
>>> Reply-To: set
>>>
>>>
>>> -- David Woolley
>>> Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
>>> RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of 
>>> spam,
>>> that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not 
>>> work.
>>>
The Editor
Heretic Press
http://www.hereticpress.com
Email dogstar27@optushome.com
Received on Thursday, 6 August 2009 07:35:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:32 GMT