W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: On Focus and On Input (3.2.1 & 3.2.2)

From: W Reagan <wreagan1@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 00:29:04 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <284542.53688.qm@web111601.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
To: 'wai-ig list' <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Cc: forums@david-woolley.me.uk
David, I just became a member of this forum a few hours ago. How can you expect me to know "As I already stated..."

--- On Thu, 8/6/09, David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk> wrote:


From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
Subject: Re: On Focus and On Input (3.2.1 & 3.2.2)
To: "W Reagan" <wreagan1@yahoo.com>
Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Date: Thursday, August 6, 2009, 7:23 AM


W Reagan wrote:
> My site does not contain any forms, scripts, tables, or timed response.
>  Is only contains, css/html, and images.
>  Is OnFocus and/or On Input an applicable checkpoint for me to check for my site?
>  

As I've already stated, a site without scripts cannot possibly have onfocus attributes, so the question is meaningless.

I get a feeling you are after legal advice on how to be just within the law on compliance, in which case you need to consult a lawyer as nothing we say can be construed as legal advice.

Generally you will get a better response here if you ask how to maximise accessibility, given constraints we can sympathise and with a clear indication of the nature of the content in question.

Reply-To: set.
-- David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Thursday, 6 August 2009 07:29:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:32 GMT