RE: examples of sites with good accessibility

On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Derek Featherstone wrote:

> Hi Bob... I'm just going over your comments on John Foliot's test page
> at http://wats.ca/test1.html
>
> you said it was:
>
> >totally unreadable, well unusable in EMACSpeak.  and probably
> >in other text only or non  windoze systems....
>
> I think you need to spell it out for us that aren't using EMACSpeak -
> the page is very very very simple HTML -  headings, paragraphs, and
> images with some attributes. I'm being serious - what is it about the
> page that is unusable? does it sound garbled? is it confusing? What
> *exactly*?
>
> Bob - give us something constructive such as some insight into what
> you're experiencing with that page. Help us to understand...


I might have seen it all but basically it was


1.  firefox

2.  firefox

3.  firefox

4.  download firefox

5.

6.  [image]

7.  firefox


from memory but that is basically all that was there.  maybe that is what
was posted..

Bob

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NO response will ever be given to anyone using earthlink.net
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve Neither liberty nor safety",    Benjamin Franklin
-   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -
   ASCII Ribbon Campaign                        accessBob
    NO HTML/PDF/RTF in e-mail                   accessys@smartnospam.net
    NO MSWord docs in e-mail                    Access Systems, engineers
    NO attachments in e-mail,  *LINUX powered*   access is a civil right
*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#
THIS message and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be
privileged.  They are intended ONLY for the individual or entity named

Received on Tuesday, 31 October 2006 02:06:31 UTC