Orion Adrian wrote: > I consider it a programming language. They do not. They simply > described it as CSS 2. I was happy enough to accept your certification until that statement. Certification bodies may have reasons to use inaccurate language, people claiming expertise do not. -- Regards, Jon Hanna "…if it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it's probably not a ConceptualWork about a duck." - Mark BakerReceived on Monday, 6 June 2005 23:14:05 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:21 GMT