Re: Accessibility of "CHM" format resources

Orion Adrian wrote:
> I consider it a programming language. They do not. They simply
> described it as CSS 2.

I was happy enough to accept your certification until that statement. 
Certification bodies may have reasons to use inaccurate language, people 
claiming expertise do not.

--
Regards,
Jon Hanna

"…if it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it's probably not a 
ConceptualWork about a duck." - Mark Baker

Received on Monday, 6 June 2005 23:14:05 UTC