W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: Navigational features

From: Gez Lemon <gez.lemon@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 06:18:19 +0000
Message-ID: <e2a28a920512032218h216f9404w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Cc: "Bailey, Bruce" <Bruce.Bailey@ed.gov>, Guide Lines list <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>

On 04/12/05, Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu> wrote:
> It is interesting that you say that parsing unambiguously is meaningless
> when it was cited as one of the major accessibility reasons for requiring
> validity.

The reason that I think parsed unambiguously is meaningless is that
it's not a qualified term. Whether it was explicitly stated or not, I
suspect that parsed unambiguously with regards to the appropriate
specification was probably more of the reason behind those arguing in
favour of validity.

> The definition of 'programmatically determined' is also quoted wrong.

Sorry; I was paraphrasing, and got a bit carried away.

Supplement your vitamins
Received on Sunday, 4 December 2005 06:18:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:57 UTC