W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2005

RE: Next meeting?

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 00:11:11 -0600
To: <boland@nist.gov>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <00f101c5f899$c4499ad0$ee8cfea9@NC6000BAK>

Current plan is Jan 30 to Feb 3rd in Austin.  

 
Gregg

 -- ------------------------------ 
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center 
University of Wisconsin-Madison 


-----Original Message-----
From: boland@nist.gov [mailto:boland@nist.gov] 
Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005 9:18 AM
To: Gregg Vanderheiden
Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: Next meeting?

When and where is the next WCAG f2f meeting?

Quoting Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>:

> 
>  Yes but it is the same time as the WCAG Face to Face so.....  Can't come.

> 
> 
>  
> Gregg
> 
>  -- ------------------------------ 
> Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
> Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
> Director - Trace R & D Center 
> University of Wisconsin-Madison 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG [mailto:rscano@iwa-italy.org] 
> Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 2:30 AM
> To: 'Gregg Vanderheiden'; Bruce.Bailey@ed.gov; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Missing criteria from WCAG 2.0?
> 
> Thank you Gregg for clarify this for the group (my mistake about don't
have
> done it). This ISO will pobably be definitively discussed at the next WG 5
> meeting that will Be host here in Venice on 30th Jan 2006 to 2nd Feb. 2006
> (hosted by IWA/HWG and Engineering SpA). I think there will be also
> possibility for discussion of ISO 9241-151 (ergonomics for world wide web
> user interfaces)
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On
Behalf
> Of Gregg Vanderheiden
> Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 4:26 AM
> To: 'Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)'; Bruce.Bailey@ed.gov; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Missing criteria from WCAG 2.0?
> 
> 
> 
> Hi 
> 
> Just for those not familiar with these guidelines. 
> 
> ISO 16071 is now 9142-171 and is heading for Candidate Draft. 
> It is originally based upon (and is harmonized with) HFES 200.3
> 
> Both are software accessibility guidelines. 
> 
> StickyKeys and functions like it are supposed to be done in OS and honored
> by applications.  But if an operating environment overrides the OS then it
> inherits the responsibility for providing the OS functions. 
> 
> Gregg
> 
> PS  I have been helping to coordinate and harmonize between WCAG 2.0 and
> both of these developing standards. 
> 
> 
>  -- ------------------------------
> Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
> Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
> Director - Trace R & D Center
> University of Wisconsin-Madison 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On
Behalf
> Of Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
> Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 3:35 PM
> To: Bruce.Bailey@ed.gov; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Missing criteria from WCAG 2.0?
> 
> 
> Java is an application enviroment, with its own rules (java, for default,
> hereditate only Java configuration like font, etc. And cannot hereditate
OS
> configuration. Like in ex-ISO 16071 (formely ISO 9241-171), these
> requirements involve software applications interfaces that can only be
> applied following OS accessibility or ISO standards (W3C don't define
> accessibility for software interfaces), like Section 508 paragraph that
you
> cited.
> 
> ----- Messaggio originale -----
>     Da: "Bailey, Bruce"<Bruce.Bailey@ed.gov>
>     Inviato: 01/12/05 22.23.11
>     A: "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org"<w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
>     Oggetto: Missing criteria from WCAG 2.0?
>       
>     I am continuing to work on a mapping from 508 to WCAG 2.0.  It seems
to
> me the following items are referenced by 1194.21 but not by WCAG 2.0.  Are
> these items applicable to Java apps?
>     
>     (b) Applications shall not disrupt or disable activated features of
> other products that are identified as accessibility features, where those
> features are developed and documented according to industry standards.
> Applications also shall not disrupt or disable activated features of any
> operating system that are identified as accessibility features where the
> application programming interface for those accessibility features has
been
> documented by the manufacturer of the operating system and is available to
> the product developer.
>     
>     (g) Applications shall not override user selected contrast and color
> selections and other individual display attributes. 
>     
>     (j) When a product permits a user to adjust color and contrast
settings,
> a variety of color selections capable of producing a range of contrast
> levels shall be provided.
>     
>     Thanks for your consideration.
>     
>     
>         
> 
> [Messaggio troncato. Toccare Modifica->Segna per il download per
recuperare
> la restante parte.]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Sunday, 4 December 2005 06:13:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:40 GMT