W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2005

RE: Navigational features

From: Bailey, Bruce <Bruce.Bailey@ed.gov>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 11:01:22 -0500
Message-ID: <CCDBDCBFA650F74AA88830D4BACDBAB50B2D4A42@wdcrobe2m02.ed.gov>
To: "Gez Lemon" <gez.lemon@gmail.com>, "Gregg Vanderheiden" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Cc: "Guide Lines list" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> The reason that I think parsed unambiguously is meaningless is 
> that it's not a qualified term. 

I am so vain I though the phrase came from my suggestion for a compromise solution:
(8)  Strategically obfuscate validity by using terms or phrases that are technology neutral, like “correct syntax” or “grammar checking”.

>> The definition of 'programmatically determined' is also quoted wrong.

> Sorry; I was paraphrasing, and got a bit carried away.

Gez, I very much appreciated your explanation.  Despite the circular definition, your examples did distinguish between the two terms.  Although I am still not certain they *couldn’t* be used interchangeably.

>> Please everyone - if you want to know the meaning of terms - 
>> use the definitions that are provided in the guidelines' glossary 
>> at the bottom and linked to from each of the success criterion.

That is only a partial solution to the problem.  Yes, the definition is written well enough, but that is neither the problem nor the solution.  I will try to explain better in another reply shortly.
Received on Sunday, 4 December 2005 16:01:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:57 UTC