W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2003

RE: Avoid deprecated features query

From: by way of Wendy A Chisholm <kynnbartlett@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 18:22:50 -0400
Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20030604182244.019745b0@localhost>
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org

Agreed.

The word "avoid" has been one of the worst stumbling
blocks for Web developers -- after "until user agents"
-- in understanding and implementing the Web Content
Accessibility Guidelines.

Nobody seems to know what "avoid" means.  If WCAG is
meant to forbid something, it should do so.  If it
does not mean to forbid something then how can you
know if you have complied?  (If "avoid" does not mean
"do not use," then any "avoid" checkbox is by
definition uncheckable.)

The word "avoid" is one word that -- in the opinion of
this Web development educator -- should be excised
from WCAG entirely.  It tells us nothing and guides no
one.

--Kynn

--- "Montgomery, Gordon"
<Gordon.Montgomery@Staples.com> wrote:
 >
 > The issue seems to be semantic, pivoting around the
 > meaning of the word
 > "avoid" in the guideline.
 >
 > I agree with Pam that "avoid" does not include the
 > sense of  its likely
 > intended meaning: "do not use" [per Wendy 's
 > interpretation]. "Avoid"
 > certainly is more of a "grey" word
 > than a "black or white" one.
 >
 > I suggest need to be clearer and replace "avoid"
 > with "do not use" in the
 > guidelines.
 >
 > This change would then create a more "black and
 > white" decision for those
 > trying to make their whole sites compliant.


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).
http://calendar.yahoo.com 
Received on Wednesday, 4 June 2003 18:23:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:22 GMT