W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > March 2004

Re: Draft RDFCore comments on web architecture document

From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:16:53 +0200
Message-Id: <ECBC0069-7996-11D8-ADAF-000A95EAFCEA@nokia.com>
Cc: "Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "rdf core" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
To: "ext Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>


I'm also OK with the proposed draft, modulo the addition of the
reference to my personal comments.

Patrick



On Mar 19, 2004, at 13:05, ext Jeremy Carroll wrote:

>
>
>
> I am happy - I think the TAG have enough comments without us adding to  
> them
> ...
>
> Jeremy
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org
>> [mailto:w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Brian McBride
>> Sent: 18 March 2004 14:32
>> To: rdf core
>> Subject: Draft RDFCore comments on web architecture document
>>
>>
>>
>> Here is a strawman formal comment from RDFCore to the TAG concerning  
>> the
>>   architecture document last call.
>>
>> I would like to decide by email that the WG approves sending this.
>> Accordingly, I will send it on behalf of the WG if I hear sufficient
>> specific endorsement and have no unresolved objections by Tues 23
>> Mar 2004.
>>
>> Brian
>>
>>
>> ===========
>>
>> RDFCore would like to congratulate the TAG for making an excellent  
>> start
>> on documenting the principles that govern the design of the  
>> architecture
>> of the web.  We also recognise the great difficulty of the task the  
>> TAG
>> has taken on.
>>
>> In response to the call for review of [1], several members of the
>> RDFCore WG have submitted many detailed comments on the document  
>> [2][3]
>> [4] which we hope the TAG will find useful.  We are confident the TAG
>> will give due consideration to each comment on its merits with or
>> without specific endorsement by the RDFCore WG.  RDFCore requests,
>> however, that the tag pay particular attention to comments that  
>> relate to:
>>
>>    - having a clear vocabulary and meaning for fundamentatal notions
>> such as resource, representation, naming, identifying etc.
>>    - interpretation and use of fragment identifiers
>>    - notions of authority and ownership of URIs and resources
>>
>> We trust that the citation of the RDF Model and Syntax specification  
>> be
>> replaced with a citation of the new RDF Concepts and Abstract Syntax
>> document [5] in due course.
>>
>> Brian McBride (co-chair)
>> On behalf of the RDFCore WG
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-webarch-20031209/
>> [2]
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/2004Ja
> nMar/0024.html
> [3]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/ 
> 2004JanMar/1053.
> html
> [4]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/ 
> 2004JanMar/1057.
> html
> [5] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-concepts-20040210/
>
>
>

--

Patrick Stickler
Nokia, Finland
patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Friday, 19 March 2004 06:18:16 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Friday, 19 March 2004 06:18:19 EST