- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:16:53 +0200
- To: "ext Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: "Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "rdf core" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
I'm also OK with the proposed draft, modulo the addition of the reference to my personal comments. Patrick On Mar 19, 2004, at 13:05, ext Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > > > I am happy - I think the TAG have enough comments without us adding to > them > ... > > Jeremy > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org >> [mailto:w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Brian McBride >> Sent: 18 March 2004 14:32 >> To: rdf core >> Subject: Draft RDFCore comments on web architecture document >> >> >> >> Here is a strawman formal comment from RDFCore to the TAG concerning >> the >> architecture document last call. >> >> I would like to decide by email that the WG approves sending this. >> Accordingly, I will send it on behalf of the WG if I hear sufficient >> specific endorsement and have no unresolved objections by Tues 23 >> Mar 2004. >> >> Brian >> >> >> =========== >> >> RDFCore would like to congratulate the TAG for making an excellent >> start >> on documenting the principles that govern the design of the >> architecture >> of the web. We also recognise the great difficulty of the task the >> TAG >> has taken on. >> >> In response to the call for review of [1], several members of the >> RDFCore WG have submitted many detailed comments on the document >> [2][3] >> [4] which we hope the TAG will find useful. We are confident the TAG >> will give due consideration to each comment on its merits with or >> without specific endorsement by the RDFCore WG. RDFCore requests, >> however, that the tag pay particular attention to comments that >> relate to: >> >> - having a clear vocabulary and meaning for fundamentatal notions >> such as resource, representation, naming, identifying etc. >> - interpretation and use of fragment identifiers >> - notions of authority and ownership of URIs and resources >> >> We trust that the citation of the RDF Model and Syntax specification >> be >> replaced with a citation of the new RDF Concepts and Abstract Syntax >> document [5] in due course. >> >> Brian McBride (co-chair) >> On behalf of the RDFCore WG >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-webarch-20031209/ >> [2] >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/2004Ja > nMar/0024.html > [3] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/ > 2004JanMar/1053. > html > [4] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/ > 2004JanMar/1057. > html > [5] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-concepts-20040210/ > > > -- Patrick Stickler Nokia, Finland patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Friday, 19 March 2004 06:18:16 UTC