RE: Draft RDFCore comments on web architecture document

I am happy - I think the TAG have enough comments without us adding to them
...

Jeremy


> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org
> [mailto:w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Brian McBride
> Sent: 18 March 2004 14:32
> To: rdf core
> Subject: Draft RDFCore comments on web architecture document
>
>
>
> Here is a strawman formal comment from RDFCore to the TAG concerning the
>   architecture document last call.
>
> I would like to decide by email that the WG approves sending this.
> Accordingly, I will send it on behalf of the WG if I hear sufficient
> specific endorsement and have no unresolved objections by Tues 23
> Mar 2004.
>
> Brian
>
>
> ===========
>
> RDFCore would like to congratulate the TAG for making an excellent start
> on documenting the principles that govern the design of the architecture
> of the web.  We also recognise the great difficulty of the task the TAG
> has taken on.
>
> In response to the call for review of [1], several members of the
> RDFCore WG have submitted many detailed comments on the document [2][3]
> [4] which we hope the TAG will find useful.  We are confident the TAG
> will give due consideration to each comment on its merits with or
> without specific endorsement by the RDFCore WG.  RDFCore requests,
> however, that the tag pay particular attention to comments that relate to:
>
>    - having a clear vocabulary and meaning for fundamentatal notions
> such as resource, representation, naming, identifying etc.
>    - interpretation and use of fragment identifiers
>    - notions of authority and ownership of URIs and resources
>
> We trust that the citation of the RDF Model and Syntax specification be
> replaced with a citation of the new RDF Concepts and Abstract Syntax
> document [5] in due course.
>
> Brian McBride (co-chair)
> On behalf of the RDFCore WG
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-webarch-20031209/
> [2]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/2004Ja
nMar/0024.html
[3]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/2004JanMar/1053.
html
[4]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/2004JanMar/1057.
html
[5] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-concepts-20040210/

Received on Friday, 19 March 2004 06:06:41 UTC