- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 13:31:34 +0000
- To: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Here is a strawman formal comment from RDFCore to the TAG concerning the architecture document last call. I would like to decide by email that the WG approves sending this. Accordingly, I will send it on behalf of the WG if I hear sufficient specific endorsement and have no unresolved objections by Tues 23 Mar 2004. Brian =========== RDFCore would like to congratulate the TAG for making an excellent start on documenting the principles that govern the design of the architecture of the web. We also recognise the great difficulty of the task the TAG has taken on. In response to the call for review of [1], several members of the RDFCore WG have submitted many detailed comments on the document [2][3] [4] which we hope the TAG will find useful. We are confident the TAG will give due consideration to each comment on its merits with or without specific endorsement by the RDFCore WG. RDFCore requests, however, that the tag pay particular attention to comments that relate to: - having a clear vocabulary and meaning for fundamentatal notions such as resource, representation, naming, identifying etc. - interpretation and use of fragment identifiers - notions of authority and ownership of URIs and resources We trust that the citation of the RDF Model and Syntax specification be replaced with a citation of the new RDF Concepts and Abstract Syntax document [5] in due course. Brian McBride (co-chair) On behalf of the RDFCore WG [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-webarch-20031209/ [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/2004JanMar/0024.html [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/2004JanMar/1053.html [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/2004JanMar/1057.html [5] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-concepts-20040210/
Received on Thursday, 18 March 2004 08:32:32 UTC