Dan Brickley wrote: > * Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us> [2004-03-17 17:38-0600] > >>>Do we have our first erratum? >>> >>I think we should say that the 1988 reference is genuine, but not widely >>known. >> > > How annoying. I just trawled back through old versions of the spec: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-rdf-schema-20000327/ (CR of March 2000) has it. > > http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/PR-rdf-schema-19990303/ (PR of March 1999) didn't. > > Took 4 years for someone to spot the typo. Wonder what else will have > surfaced by 2008... That Microsoft had patented that 1988 version of XML? > > Dan > > >Received on Thursday, 18 March 2004 08:36:25 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thursday, 18 March 2004 08:36:27 EST