W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2003

rdf:RDF examples (was Re: Minutes of 2003-10-03 RDFCore WG telcon)

From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 11:55:41 +0100
To: Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <20031006115541.734dac03.dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>

On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 15:53:10 -0400
Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org> wrote:

> Dave Beckett wrote:
> > 2003-10-03 RDFCore WG meeting
> > 
> snip
> > ACTION 2003-10-03#8 frankm change primer to have an omitted rdf:RDF example
> Not quite.  I accepted an action to reflect the optionality of rdf:RDF 
> in the Primer.  It seems silly, given all the examples currently in the 
> Primer, to have yet another example just to omit the rdf:RDF.  What I 
> propose to do is to comment, at the point where rdf:RDF is introduced, 
> that the enclosing rdf:RDF element is optional in situations where the 
> XML can be identified as RDF/XML by context (but it doesn't hurt to 
> provide it anyway), and to see the Syntax document for further details.

OK.  I've done the same in the editor's draft of rdf/xml - mentioned it
when I gave the 'full example' and used rdf:RDF for the first time.

Received on Monday, 6 October 2003 06:58:26 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Monday, 6 October 2003 06:58:30 EDT