W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2003

Re: rdf:RDF examples (was Re: Minutes of 2003-10-03 RDFCore WG telcon)

From: Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 08:37:14 -0400
Message-ID: <3F8161FA.1050501@acm.org>
To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

Dave Beckett wrote:

> On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 15:53:10 -0400
> Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org> wrote:
> 
> 
>>Dave Beckett wrote:
>>
>>
>>>2003-10-03 RDFCore WG meeting
>>>
>>>
>>snip
>>
>>
>>
>>>ACTION 2003-10-03#8 frankm change primer to have an omitted rdf:RDF example
>>>
>>
>>Not quite.  I accepted an action to reflect the optionality of rdf:RDF 
>>in the Primer.  It seems silly, given all the examples currently in the 
>>Primer, to have yet another example just to omit the rdf:RDF.  What I 
>>propose to do is to comment, at the point where rdf:RDF is introduced, 
>>that the enclosing rdf:RDF element is optional in situations where the 
>>XML can be identified as RDF/XML by context (but it doesn't hurt to 
>>provide it anyway), and to see the Syntax document for further details.
>>
> 
> OK.  I've done the same in the editor's draft of rdf/xml - mentioned it
> when I gave the 'full example' and used rdf:RDF for the first time.
> 



Makes sense to me.


--Frank

 
Received on Monday, 6 October 2003 08:10:55 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Monday, 6 October 2003 08:10:58 EDT