W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2003

Re: Proposal to reject I18N XMLLiteral comments

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 09:45:15 -0500
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20031107144515.GI26667@w3.org>

Martin's message hasn't arrived in my inbox yet, thanks for the 
heads up. 

Are there objections couched any differently to the previous 
dialog we have had? New points, observations, evidence etc?

Dan

* Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com> [2003-11-07 15:38+0100]
> 
> 
> 
> I propose that we reject the comments in
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003OctDec/0120.html
> 
> with headings
> 
> - Treatment of language information for XML Literals:
> - XML Literals as typed literals
> 
> and send the following reply:
> 
> [[
> 
> Dear Martin,
> 
> thank you for your comments.
> 
> This message replies to the two comments
> 
> - Treatment of language information for XML Literals:
> - XML Literals as typed literals
> 
> We regret that we have decided to reject these comments.
> 
> A rationale can be found in
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/att-0275/i18n-par
> t.html
> 
> (with the addition of the link to the following msg which is the webont
> endorsement of the current design:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Oct/0039.html
> )
> 
> Please reply cc-ing www-rdf-comments as to whether you accept this or not,
> and if you wish to formally object.
> 
> thanks again
> 
> Jeremy Carroll
> 
> ]]
> 
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 7 November 2003 09:45:35 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Friday, 7 November 2003 09:45:38 EST