W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2003

Re: Proposal to reject I18N XMLLiteral comments

From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 16:41:26 +0200
To: ext Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BBD17BB6.4A65%patrick.stickler@nokia.com>


I second Jeremy's proposal. This is water under the bridge...

Patrick


On 2003-11-07 16:38, "ext Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> I propose that we reject the comments in
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003OctDec/0120.html
> 
> with headings
> 
> - Treatment of language information for XML Literals:
> - XML Literals as typed literals
> 
> and send the following reply:
> 
> [[
> 
> Dear Martin,
> 
> thank you for your comments.
> 
> This message replies to the two comments
> 
> - Treatment of language information for XML Literals:
> - XML Literals as typed literals
> 
> We regret that we have decided to reject these comments.
> 
> A rationale can be found in
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/att-0275/i18n-par
> t.html
> 
> (with the addition of the link to the following msg which is the webont
> endorsement of the current design:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Oct/0039.html
> )
> 
> Please reply cc-ing www-rdf-comments as to whether you accept this or not,
> and if you wish to formally object.
> 
> thanks again
> 
> Jeremy Carroll
> 
> ]]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 7 November 2003 09:43:43 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Friday, 7 November 2003 09:43:46 EST