- From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 09:15:11 +0100
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
- Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20030517091358.0230cee8@127.0.0.1>
Time:
10:00:00 Fri May 16 2003 in America/New York duration 120 minutes
which is equivalent to
15:00:00 Fri May 16 2003 in Europe/London
Phone: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)#7332
irc: irc.w3.org #rdfcore
Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0183.html
IRC log: http://ilrt.org/discovery/chatlogs/rdfcore/2003-05-16
(Copy of my IRC log attached for W3 archive)
Summary of decisions:
RESOLVED: we accept comment pfps-08, and 3.4 in the semantics editors draft
addresses it.
RESOLVED: we accept comment pfps-01, and that it is addressed by the
revised text in the semantics editor's draft.
RESOLVED: to not accept comment pfps-03
RESOLVED: we accept comment pfps-05, and it is addressed by by rule rdfs1
in section 4.2 of the Semantics editor's draft
RESOLVED: to accept comment timbl-03 and remove requirement for List
element type triples to be generated by RDF parsers
RESOLVED: do not accept xmlsch-05
RESOLVED: to accept xmlsch-06, with revised wording as noted
Summary of actions:
(Note: some actions were inferred, and are marked [[[to be confirmed]]])
PatH respond to Peter regarding pfps-08 resolution
PatH respond to Peter regarding pfps-01 resolution
PatH respond to Peter regarding pfps-03 resolution
PatH [[[to be confirmed]]] respond to Peter regarding pfps-05 resolution
daveb respond to commenter regarding timbl-03 decision
daveb apprise webont of timbl-03 decision
daveb update syntax document in light of timbl-03 decision
daveb update test cases in light of timbl-03 decision
frankM update primer in light of timbl-03 decision
bwm review schema document for changes in light of timbl-03 decision
PatH [[[to be confirmed]]] check for changes to Semantics in light of
timbl-03 decision
jjc respond to commenter regarding xmlsch-05 decision
jjc [[[to be confirmed]]] update conepts document per xmlsch-06 decision
jjc [[[to be confirmed]]] respond to commenter
--swebscrape:
date:2003-05-16
--
1: scribe: Jan being unavailable - GK scribes
2: Roll Call
Present: Brian McBride
Dave Beckett
Pat Hayes
Graham Klyne,
Jeremy Carroll
Frank Manola
Mike Dean
Guest: Joseph Reagle (for agendum 3)
Regrets: Patrick Stickler
Jos de Roo
3: Update on embedding RDF in XML
Joseph Reagle summarized efforts to create a task force to discuss the matter
of embedding RDF in XHTML. See IRC log for detailed comments:
http://ilrt.org/discovery/chatlogs/rdfcore/2003-05-16#T14-08-53
In summary, initial goal to to scope the problem, gather initial reqirements,
determine if the problem is realistically solvable and establish
communications between metadata and hypertext communities. Expect some
initial sense of tractability of the problem with a month or so.
Draft charter for the task force:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-semweb-cg/2003May/0040.html
esw wiki on this stuff:
http://esw.w3.org/topic/EmbeddingRDFinHTML
We thank Joseph for apprising us of this planned activity.
4: Review Agenda
No changes.
5: Next telecon 30 May 2003 1000 Boston Time
[[[Did we get a voluteer scribe? If so, I missed it - GK]]]
6: Minutes of 09 May 2003 telecon
See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0138.html
No comments.
7: Confirm Status of Completed Actions
Per agenda:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0183.html
All accepted.
8: Issue pfps-08
See:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-08
Proposal as in:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0181.html
Propose: that we accept the comment,
and 3.4 in the semantics editors draft addresses it.
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-mt-20030117/#dtype_interp
Jeremy has reviewed the test and agrees.
Proposed PatH, seconded: JJC [[[?]]]
None against, none abstrain.
RESOLVED: we accept comment pfps-08, and 3.4 in the semantics editors draft
addresses it.
ACTION: PatH respond to Peter regarding pfps-08 resolution
9: Issue pfps-01
See:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-01
Per Pat's message
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0162.html
Propose:
- accept
- note that it has been addressed by the following text (between **-**) in
the editors draft:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-mt-20030117/#dtype_interp
[[
The datatype map which also contains the set of all pairs of the form
<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#sss , sss>, where sss is a built-in
datatype **which has well-defined lexical and value spaces and a
lexical-to-value mapping and** is named sss in XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes
[XML-SCHEMA2], eg decimal, string, is referred to here as XSD.
]]
Also, some suggested editorial changes to this per:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0175.html
Proposed: path, as above, with editorial discretion regarding changes
Seconded: ?
RESOLVED: we accept comment pfps-01, and that it is addressed by the
revised text in the semantics editor's draft
ACTION: PatH respond to Peter regarding pfps-01 resolution
10: issue pfps-03 LBase appendix is pointless
See:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-03
Per Pat's message
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0162.html
Propose:
- not accept
- note that the purpose of the appendix is informative (for a certain
class of readers) rather than definitive.
- note that document states:
[[
"The editor believes that both of these descriptions, and also the closure
rules described in section 4, are all in exact correspondence, but only the
directly described model theory in sections 1- 3 should be taken as
normative."
]]
It was also noted that even for DAML, the axiomatic semantics were most
commonly cited: people do find these easier to understand.
Pat proposes, DaveB seconds
None against, none abstain
RESOLVED: to not accept comment pfps-03
ACTION: PatH respond to Peter regarding pfps-03 resolution
11: Issue pfps-05 RDFS closure rules
See:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-05
Per Pat's message
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0162.html
and Graham's additions:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0175.html
Propose
- accept it
- addressed by rule rdfs1 in section 4.2 of the editor's draft
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-mt-20030117/#dtype_interp
so that using rdfs1 + rdfs3 + rdfs7a + rdfs9
rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:range rdfs:Class . (sect 3.3 axiom)
rdf:XMLLiteral rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Literal . (sect 3.3 axiom)
gives:
rdfs:Literal rdf:type rdfs:Class . (by rdfs3)
gives:
rdfs:Literal rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Resource . (by rdfs7a)
then, from rdfs1, we have:
_:nnn rdf:type rdfs:Literal
hence:
_:nnn rdf:type rdfs:Resource (by rdfs9)
Proposed, as above: PatH, seconded: GK
None against, none abstain
RESOLVED: we accept comment pfps-05, and it is addressed by by rule rdfs1
in section 4.2 of the Semantics editor's draft
ACTION: PatH [[[to be confirmed]]] respond to Peter regarding pfps-05
resolution
12: Issue timbl-03
See:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#timbl-03
The response from WebOnt indicated no clear technical problem with removal of
List type triples, but a preference to leave them in.
Discussion - see:
http://ilrt.org/discovery/chatlogs/rdfcore/2003-05-16#T14-41-24
A first straw poll was evenly divided.
After further discussion, a second straw poll was somewhat in favout of
removing the extra triples.
Proposed: to accept comment timbl-03
Proposed PatH, seconded: GK
For: PatH, GK, FrankM; against: none; abstain: jjc, daveb, miked
RESOLVED: to accept comment timbl-03 and remove requirement for List
element type triples to be generated by RDF parsers
ACTION: daveb respond to commenter regarding timbl-03 decision
ACTION: daveb apprise webont of timbl-03 decision
ACTION: daveb update syntax document in light of timbl-03 decision
ACTION: daveb update test cases in light of timbl-03 decision
ACTION: frankM update primer in light of timbl-03 decision
ACTION: bwm review schema document for changes in light of timbl-03 decision
ACTION: PatH [[[to be confirmed]]] check for changes to Semantics in light
of timbl-03 decision
13: Issue xmlsch-05 Character Sequences
See:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#xmlsch-05
Per Jeremy's message:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0151.html
PROPOSE: to not accept this comment.
Rationale:
It feels like a fairly extensive editorial change. Also in the semantic web
activity documents xsd:string is always refered to in its qualified form, and
so the possible confusion is diminsihed.
Proposed: jjc, seconded: daveb, as above
None against, none abstain
RESOLVED: do not accept xmlsch-05
ACTION: jjc respond to commenter regarding xmlsch-05 decision
14: Issue xmlsch-06 natural language data
See:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#xmlsch-06
Per Jeremy's message
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0151.html
Discussion:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0216.html
PROPOSE to accept; with rewording like this:
[[
A plain literal is a string combined with an optional language
identifier. This may be used for plain text
in a natural language. As recommended in the RDF formal semantics
[RDF-SEMANTICS], these plain literals are self-denoting.
]]
Proposed: jjc, seconded daveb
None against, none abstain
RESOLVED: to accept xmlsch-06, with revised wording as noted
ACTION: jjc [[[to be confirmed]]] update conepts document per xmlsch-06
decision
ACTION: jjc [[[to be confirmed]]] respond to commenter
Meeting closed.
There was some "after hours" discussion of Peter Patel-Schneider's
observation of non- monotonicity in datatyped interpretations. See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0187.html
and subsequent thread.
--swebscrape:
swebscrape:N3:python: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/scripts/minutes2n3.py
-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>
PGP: 0FAA 69FF C083 000B A2E9 A131 01B9 1C7A DBCA CB5E
Attachments
- text/plain attachment: 2003-05-16-irc.txt
Received on Saturday, 17 May 2003 04:21:20 UTC