- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 19:08:29 +0100
- To: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Checking the semantics doc I find [[ This has been re-done somewhat as a result of email correspondence. The situation now is somewhat subtle. The actual conditions are stated as part of the rdf and rdfs semantics simply as conditions on XML literals considered as a syntactic category. This is what the comment was concerned with. Now, however, in D-interpretations, the 'built-in datatype' is introduced explicitly as an entity, and some text added here to clarify the importance of this for OWL-type reasoners. This allows non-datatype-savvy engines to use the XML syntax and also allows more sophisticated reasoners to build on D-interpretations. ]] We have an issue we are moving from not accept to accept and that require WG review. Best I can figure here is that Peter was making a subtle point of formal semantics. My vague understanding is (paraphrasing what Pat says above): - previously the semantics of xml literals were specified as semantic conditions in the RDF and RDFS semantics - there was a subtle problem (that escapes me) with making it clear that a datatype processor could really treat it like a datatype - this is fixed in the current ed's draft by making the built in data explicitly present in (all?) datatype interpretations and adding some clarifying text: [[ The semantic conditions for rdf interpretations impose the correct interpretation on literals typed by 'rdf:XMLLiteral'. However, a D-interpretation recognizes the datatype to exist as an entity, rather than simply being a semantic condition imposed on the RDF typed literal syntax. Semantic extensions which can express identity conditions on resources could therefore draw stronger conclusions from D-interpretations than from rdfs interpretations. ]] Seeing nothing I disagree with I invite Pat to propose the WG: - reopen pfps-08 - accept pfps-08 - approve the approach Pat has taken and this modified text Brian
Received on Thursday, 15 May 2003 14:07:59 UTC