W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2002

DECIDED: untidy semantics

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 13:17:58 +0200
To: "w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OFEA395599.F4C5BB6F-ONC1256C3B.003C6959-C1256C3B.003E1289@agfa.be>

[regretting not to have been there, but was impossible]

taking http://ilrt.org/discovery/chatlogs/rdfcore/2002-09-20.html
for the moment for granted

[[[
....
[14:48:03] jjcscribe Vote: untidy 7, tidy 5.
[14:48:11] jjcscribe DECIDED: untidy semantics.
[14:48:22] jjcscribe DanC has outstanding dissent.
]]]

I'm recording outstanding dissent too !!!

I can't help but I can't think how to
avoid (in my implementation) the entailment

==== untidyP
@prefix : <untidy#> .
:Sergey :votes "untidy" .
:Graham :votes "untidy" .
====

==== untidyC
@prefix : <untidy#> .
:Sergey :votes _:x .
:Graham :votes _:x .
====

(and for the moment I even have no time
to think about it)

-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/

PS untidy typed literals _:x"abc" are OK for me
   but "xyz" is always "xyz" (bare literal, *non*typed)
Received on Saturday, 21 September 2002 10:49:20 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:51:01 EDT