Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics

[...]

> Perhaps I'm not fully understanding you. I'm still struggling to
> see the added utility of the "typeless" literal over the string
> typed literal, apart from perhaps syntactic sugar so one doesn't
> have to type as much. They seem to be functionally equivalent.
>
> What am I missing?

well, it's a bit like the case of a uri
you don't say xsd:string<uri> don't you
"xyz" is also just an identifier

-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/

Received on Tuesday, 24 September 2002 08:28:27 UTC