W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2002

Re: DECIDED: untidy semantics

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 00:04:50 +0200
To: "Brian McBride <bwm" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: "w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF67922DBE.360D9948-ONC1256C3D.007619BC-C1256C3D.00794CB0@agfa.be>


>At 13:17 21/09/2002 +0200, Jos De_Roo wrote:
>
>>[regretting not to have been there, but was impossible]
>>
>>taking http://ilrt.org/discovery/chatlogs/rdfcore/2002-09-20.html
>>for the moment for granted
>>
>>[[[
>>....
>>[14:48:03] jjcscribe Vote: untidy 7, tidy 5.
>>[14:48:11] jjcscribe DECIDED: untidy semantics.
>>[14:48:22] jjcscribe DanC has outstanding dissent.
>>]]]
>>
>>I'm recording outstanding dissent too !!!
>
>Reading what you say below, perhaps you are not dissenting.  The question
>put was:
>
>[[
>  where you have an rdf;descipriton element containing a property element
>of <age>10</age> is that tidy or untidy.
>]]
>
>You are objecting to
>
>   <a> <b> "foo" .
>
>being untidy but that
>
>   <a> <b> _:dt"foo" .
>
>is ok.

right, the latter is untidy
thanks for the clarification Brian

>Then, the question as put, if it translated to:
>
>   <something> <age> _:dt"10" .
>
>would you be ok with that?

of course I would
but then how would you write (in RDF/XML)
   <something> <someproperty> "somestring" .
which I consider as a very meaningful statement

one can have
   <something> <someproperty> _:somelabel"somestring" .
when using an explicit rdf:nodeId attribute

-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Monday, 23 September 2002 18:05:30 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:51:02 EDT