W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2002

Re: Should rdf:nil be rdf:Nil...

From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2002 14:46:01 -0600
Message-Id: <p05111b41b9f32437e1ac@[65.217.30.130]>
To: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

>... in keeping with the conventions for object and property names?
>
>#g
>

nil is an odd case: its the only non-property  and non-class thing 
with a name in RDFS. So the conventions don't apply to it properly. 
I'd rather leave it lowercase, however, else people will think its a 
class.

Pat


>-------------------
>Graham Klyne
><GK@NineByNine.org>


-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola              			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32501           				(850)291 0667    cell
phayes@ai.uwf.edu	          http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
s.pam@ai.uwf.edu   for spam
Received on Saturday, 9 November 2002 15:45:38 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:54:02 EDT