W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2002

Should rdf:nil be rdf:Nil...

From: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2002 12:36:49 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20021109123559.03b5e560@127.0.0.1>
To: RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>


... in keeping with the conventions for object and property names?

#g


-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>

Received on Saturday, 9 November 2002 08:59:12 EST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Graham Klyne: "Model theory review, thumbs up"
Previous message: Brian McBride: "Re: Literals are resources [was Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms]"
Next in thread: Jos De_Roo: "Re: Should rdf:nil be rdf:Nil..."
Maybe reply: Jos De_Roo: "Re: Should rdf:nil be rdf:Nil..."
Reply: Brian McBride: "Re: Should rdf:nil be rdf:Nil..."
Reply: pat hayes: "Re: Should rdf:nil be rdf:Nil..."
Maybe reply: Dave Beckett: "Re: Should rdf:nil be rdf:Nil..."
Maybe reply: Jos De_Roo: "Re: Should rdf:nil be rdf:Nil..."

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:54:01 EDT